Opportunity understanding
Break complex tenders into source-linked requirements, criteria, deadlines and risks your team can track.
Tender and RFP document analysisProposalOS capability
Know who owns each section and what state it is actually in
Several people write one proposal, usually alongside their real work. The question that wastes the most time is not how to write a section — it is who has it, and whether it is finished.
Steps 5–6 · build the workspace, draft and collaborate
How this works
Section state as a property, not a conversation
Ownership and progress live on the section itself rather than in an email thread somebody has to reconstruct. Each section has a status and a version history; tasks carry an assignee and a due date; comments attach to the section they concern, so a discussion survives the next draft instead of being orphaned by it. Access follows role, so contributors see the sections they are responsible for and reviewers see what they are being asked to decide.
Explore adjacent capabilities
Organizational knowledge
Govern approved experience, methods, policies and company facts with owners and versions.
Organizational knowledge repositoryPowerful search
Find relevant evidence by words and meaning, narrowed by type, tag, language and approval state.
Search across company knowledgeA clearer proposal operating model
See ProposalOS around your team’s real workflow
Tell us how your organization handles opportunities, evidence and review. We’ll tailor the conversation to that context.
Further reading
- Why requirement review needs source contextExtracted requirement lists lose the conditions around them. Reviewing beside the source is what keeps meaning intact.
- A practical guide to evidence-led proposalsHow to turn approved project experience into proposal claims an evaluation committee can verify.
- Source-linked compliance checksProduct direction: every compliance finding points back to the requirement and the section it refers to.