Skip to main content
All resources

Guides

How to analyze an RFP: a first pass that catches what actually decides the outcome

A repeatable first pass for reading an RFP: eligibility, mandatory requirements, evaluation criteria, then effort — and why that order is what saves the week.

What the first pass is actually for

Not writing, and not understanding the client's business. The first pass answers two questions: should we pursue this at all, and what exactly must the response contain. Teams that skip straight to drafting discover the answer to the first question in week two, after the senior time is already spent, and discover the answer to the second on the day of submission.

A first pass that produces a summary has failed. A first pass should produce a decision and a list — and the list should carry the clause each item came from.

Read for four things, in this order

The order is the method. Each step can end the analysis, and ending early is a win rather than a failure.

  1. Eligibility. Registration, classification, turnover thresholds, licences, local presence, joint-venture rules, conflict of interest. One condition you cannot meet ends it here.
  2. Mandatory requirements. Everything the document says shall be provided — forms, certificates, attachments, formats, languages, signatures, page limits. These are pass or fail, and they are where formally strong bids die.
  3. Evaluation criteria. How the marks are distributed across technical approach, experience, key experts, methodology and price. This tells you where effort earns something.
  4. Effort and risk. What answering properly will cost in senior time, what evidence you already hold, and what you would have to create from nothing.

Where the meaning hides

Requirements rarely sit alone. The sentence before one often says who it applies to; the sentence after often says when it can be waived. A row reading "provide three comparable references" is a different requirement from "provide three comparable references completed within the last five years, at least one in the client's own governorate" — and the qualifier is frequently in a different section from the requirement it modifies. This is why an extracted list is a starting point rather than the analysis itself.

Turn the document into something the team can track

The output of a first pass is a requirement list where every row carries the clause it came from, an owner, and a state. That list becomes the compliance matrix at the end — the same rows, now mapped to where each is answered and to the evidence behind the answer. Building it once and maintaining it beats building a checklist at the start and a compliance matrix again at the end from a document that has since been amended.

Then decide, before you spend the week

With eligibility confirmed, the mandatory list built and the marks understood, the bid decision becomes a judgement on evidence rather than on enthusiasm. The strongest reason to decline is not that a tender is hard — it is that the marks sit where your evidence is thinnest and a better-matched opportunity is open the same month.